Course progress with a reviewable hand-in

The original scope covered authenticated access to course modules, progress tracking and a learning cadence. It gave learners a structure for working through the material.

Later work added a review loop. Recording progress and submitting evidence for a reviewer are different steps. The platform supports both.

The review workflow brings pending submissions, supporting evidence and attempt history together. A reviewer can inspect the work before recording a decision. When requesting changes, the reviewer must include a note so the learner has a written response to act on.

The implementation rejects self-review and a second decision on an already decided submission. It updates the review record, progress and evidence together in one database transaction, keeping the decision and its associated progress change within the same operation.

A learner's work can be returned for changes instead of being represented only by a completion tick.

A further extension added saved drafts and multi-document submissions, including PDFs and word-processing documents. Document parsing runs in the background, with its processing state stored in the database. The platform retains the draft while preparing the submitted material.

Saved drafts persist across a service restart. Learners can prepare a hand-in with several documents, while reviewers receive the evidence alongside the submission.

The reviewer workflow and document-draft extension were deployed in July 2026. The wider platform has a recorded September 2026 production release.

The course-module scope grew to cover the work around completion: preparing evidence, handing it in, reviewing an attempt and explaining requested changes. Review remains a human decision.